★ ★ ★
The Adventures & Memoirs of Sherlock Holmes by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle | 1892, original publication; 2004, this edition | Sterling Publishing | Hardcover $14.95
It’s elementary — there’s no more intriguing detective than Sherlock Holmes, with his unequalled powers of deduction, and no better mysteries than the tricky ones that only he can solve. Here are some of the finest Holmes stories, recounted by his trusty friend and assistant, Dr. Watson.
Only 3 stars for Sherlock Holmes! What are you, some kind of bonkers philistine with a puddle of cheese for brains? Your opinions are bad and you should feel bad.
That’s what you’re thinking right now, isn’t it?
Look, as it turns out, this whole Sherlock thing is not my thing. Holmes is not my homie.
It isn’t that these stories are bad! They’re not. A 3 star rating is nothing to sneeze at. I can still appreciate these stories for what they are — classic mysteries featuring unique, witty characters that have inspired a billion adaptations and reinterpretations.
I didn’t outright dislike this book. I was just kind of bored after the first couple of stories, TBH. Every story follows a formula: someone brings a case to Holmes, Holmes sees a bunch of details and clues that everyone else misses, some kind of small crisis or adventure happens, and Watson writes it all down from his own point of view. The end. Some of the mysteries were fairly interesting, but after a while they all started to blend together.
– – –
Beyond that, my main complaint is that Doyle relies on a lot of slight-of-hand storytelling devices. For example, take the overused “My dear Watson, didn’t you notice the X?” scenario where X is a thing that the reader, seeing things from Watson’s point of view, would also be unaware of until it was suddenly important. There’s also a lot of telling instead of showing, which I don’t think would fly if these books were written for modern mystery readers — somewhat ironically, as Doyle essentially popularized the genre single-handedly.
However, it isn’t entirely fair to judge the classics by my modern standards, is it? Especially since the mystery genre is not something I usually go for. Dunno why, I just am often bored with mystery books. Which further complicates my thoughts on rating this book, because how can I fairly rate a book if I rarely even read other comparable stories?
– – –
- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle Literary Estate
- Discovering Sherlock Holmes community readng project from Stanford University
- The Sherlock Holmes Society of London
- “Sherlock Holmes’ London” in the Smithsonian
Publication information: Doyle, Arthur Conan. The Adventures and Memoirs of Sherlock Holmes. New York: Sterling Publishing, 2004. Print.
Source: Owned, original source unknown.
Disclaimer: I am not compensated, monetarily or otherwise, for reviews of books or other products.